>>748
＞Roughly, for an elliptic curve in "initial theta data", Mochizuki's inequality says that the size of one region (encoding one side of Szpiro) is less than the size of a "blurry" region (encoding the other side of Szpiro).

"blurry" region って、IUTの正式用語なの？ｗ（＾＾；

（>>747より）
http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/SS2018-08.pdf
August 2018 Report by the other participants in the March 2018
　discussions
Why abc is still a conjecture
PETER SCHOLZE AND JAKOB STIX
(抜粋)
P10の最後
We voiced these concerns in this form at the end of the fourth day of discussions. On the
fifth and final day, Mochizuki tried to explain to us why this is not a problem after all. In
particular, he claimed that up to the “blurring” given by certain indeterminacies the diagram
does commute; it seems to us that this statement means that the blurring must be by a factor
of at least O(l^2) rendering the inequality thus obtained useless.
(引用終り)

とあって、SCHOLZEは、“blurring”を攻撃しているように見えたんだ
で、Mochizukiが苦し紛れの口頭説明に、“blurring”を言い出したと見ていたんだけどねぇ（原論文は、もちろん読んでないからさｗ）
へー、"blurry" region って、IUTの正式用語なの？へー ｗ（＾＾；

（参考）
https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/blurry
Weblio
blurry
(抜粋)
主な意味
ぼやけた、不鮮明な