>>438
「ショルツ氏の反論は外れ」というのが
望月本人、星、山下、それに Dupuy氏の主張です

・Dupuy氏の主張は、下記抜粋ご参照
・山下氏の主張
　http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUTch-discussions-2018-03.html
　[YKId] Brief excerpt on the "id-version" of IUTeich from the lecture notes for
　　a series of lectures on IUTeich given by Go Yamashita in November 2018
　　at Keio University
　http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Yamashita%20---%20Keio2018Nov_id_version.pdf
・望月本人＆星の主張 http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUTch-discussions-2018-03.html
　（この中に、Ivan Fesenko氏の意見もある）

（参考）
https://www.uvm.edu/~tdupuy/papers.html
[ Taylor Dupuy's Homepage]論文集
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13108.pdf
Date: April 30, 2020.
The Statement of Mochizuki's Corollary 3.12, Initial Theta Data, and the First Two Indeterminacies, (with A. Hilado)
(抜粋)
P14
Remark 3.8.3. (1) The assertion of [SS17, pg 10] is that (3.3) is the only relation between
the q-pilot and Θ-pilot degrees. The assertion of [Moc18, C14] is that [SS17, pg 10] is
not what occurs in [Moc15a]. The reasoning of [SS17, pg 10] is something like what
follows:
(a)～(g)略
(2) We would like to point out that the diagram on page 10 of [SS17] is very similar to
the diagram on §8.4 part 7, page 76 of the unpublished manuscript [Tan18] which
Scholze and Stix were reading while preparing [SS17].
(3) As of August 1st 2019, the documents above can be found at http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUTch-discussions-2018-03.html.
We note that there is also the review [Rob 3] which some may find interesting.

[SS17] Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix, Why abc is still a conjecture., 2017. 1, 1, 1e, 2, 7.5.3
(引用終り)