IUT用語集

IUT論文は査読制度が崩壊

p,woitのブログ コメント
W April 19, 2020 at 9:53 am

>Some defenders of IUT like to point
out that Scholze and Stix didn’t give
their precise objection until 2018.
But this phenomenon, given that
it was noticed by most people who
read the paper seriously, should have
been turned up by the refereeing
process before then.
This is, I think, the starting point
for ethical concerns about the refereeing
process.
(For instance, OP’s comment suggests
that the editors could have asked a
series of referees, ignoring those who
have negative commentary, until they
found someone willing to say it is good.)

この記述はIUT論文の査読過程が
査読制度崩壊だった事実>>83
と矛盾しないし補強している。

京大.RIMS文科省は直ちにIUT論文の
査読過程を説明する重大な責任がある。