つづき

下記の PDF 数学の超難問「ABC予想」とは？
別冊Newton「数学の世界」 増補第3版 168 - 171 2019年11月 協力 小山信也 執筆 山田久美
これ分かり易いな
必見ですね（＾＾
https://researchmap.jp/koyama
researchmap 小山 信也 コヤマ シンヤ (Shin'ya Koyama)
https://researchmap.jp/koyama/avatar.JPG
https://researchmap.jp/koyama/misc/21300350/attachment_file.pdf
数学の超難問「ABC予想」とは？ 別冊Newton「数学の世界」 増補第3版 168 - 171 2019年11月 協力 小山信也 執筆 山田久美

＜アンチIUTサイト＞
https://taro-nishino.blogspot.com/2019/03/blog-post070.html（TARO-NISHINOの日記）
ABC予想の壮大な証明をめぐって数学の巨人達が衝突する http://taro-nishino.blogspot.com/2019/03/blog-post063.html
https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=11709 （woitブログ）
Not Even Wrong Latest on abc Posted on April 3, 2020 by woit

なお、（メモ）TAYLOR DUPUYは、arxiv投稿で [SS17]を潰した

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13108.pdf
PROBABILISTIC SZPIRO, BABY SZPIRO, AND EXPLICIT SZPIRO FROM MOCHIZUKI’S COROLLARY 3.12
TAYLOR DUPUY AND ANTON HILADO Date: April 30, 2020.
P14
Remark 3.8.3. (1) The assertion of [SS17, pg 10] is that (3.3) is the only relation between
the q-pilot and Θ-pilot degrees. The assertion of [Moc18, C14] is that [SS17, pg 10] is
not what occurs in [Moc15a]. The reasoning of [SS17, pg 10] is something like what
follows:
P15
(2) We would like to point out that the diagram on page 10 of [SS17] is very similar to
the diagram on §8.4 part 7, page 76 of the unpublished manuscript [Tan18] which
Scholze and Stix were reading while preparing [SS17].
References
[SS17] Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix, Why abc is still a conjecture., 2017. 1, 1, 1e, 2, 7.5.3 ( http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUTch-discussions-2018-03.html )
[Tan18] Fucheng Tan, Note on IUT, 2018. 1, 2
つづく