>>339-340
補足

下記の 南出論文からの引用で、論文冒頭にある文章より
Abstractで、”the j-invariants of “arithmetic” elliptic curves”、

Introduction で 、”we shall regard the standard coordinate on X as the “λ” in the Legendre
form “y2 = x(x-1)(x-λ)” of the Weierstrass equation defining an elliptic
curve - and hence as being equipped with a natural classifying morphism
UX def = X ＼ D → (M ell)Q.”
と出てくるよ（＾＾

維新さんの今読んでいる、梅村本「楕円関数論」
（楕円関数・テータ関数・モジュラー関数 https://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1604268050/52- ）
でさ、この南出で使われている、楕円曲線理論に届くのぉ〜？　届かんでしょ！
（別に、梅村本「楕円関数論」をくさしているわけじゃなく、あの本は数論幾何向けではないのでは？）

そんなレベルの人がさ、
なんでIUT理論の成否が分かるの？
教えて、チコちゃん！！ｗｗ（＾＾；

(引用開始）
”Finally, by applying our slightly modified version
of inter-universal Teichm¨uller theory, together with various explicit estimates concerning heights, the j-invariants of “arithmetic” elliptic curves,
and the prime number theorem, we verify the numerically effective versions of Mochizuki’s results referred to above.”

”We shall regard X as the “λ-line” - i.e.,
we shall regard the standard coordinate on X as the “λ” in the Legendre
form “y2 = x(x-1)(x-λ)” of the Weierstrass equation defining an elliptic
curve - and hence as being equipped with a natural classifying morphism
UX def = X ＼ D → (M ell)Q. Write
log(q∀(-))
for the R-valued function on (M ell)Q(Q), hence also on UX(Q), obtained by
forming the normalized degree “deg(-)” of the effective arithmetic divisor
determined by the q-parameters of an elliptic curve over a number field at
arbitrary nonarchimedean places.”
(引用終り)
以上