>>756
>そもそも査読チームが理解できないからアクセプトされないんだろ？

望月氏が、ちゃんと説明しています
下記の(H1)と(H2)と
(H1)がSSで”conventional”
(H2)がIUTで”re-initialization”(i.e., “||”)あり

(H1)を元に、ショルツェ氏はダメだという
望月は、(H1)でなく(H2)の”re-initialization”ありだと

ここが、誤解の元ってこと
（図が描けないので、原文見て下さい）

（参考）
http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Rpt2018.pdf
REPORT ON DISCUSSIONS, HELD DURING THE
PERIOD MARCH 15 ? 20, 2018, CONCERNING
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMULLER THEORY (IUTCH) ¨
Shinichi Mochizuki
February 2019
(抜粋)
Ｐ6
§5. In some sense, it seems that the logical starting point of the differences in
point of view between SS and HM (and hence of various fundamental misunderstandings of SS) may be understood as a consequence of the difference between
the following two approaches to considering histories of operations performed on
mathematical objects in a given discussion of mathematics (cf. (T1)):

(H1) The conventional approach to histories of operations: The conventional approach that is typically taken, with regard to histories of operations performed on various mathematical objects, consists of regarding
all of these operations as being embedded within a single history.
図略
In this approach, all previously executed operations are regarded as
being permanently accessible, regardless of the content of subsequent
operations.

(H2) The approach taken in IUTch to histories of operations: By contrast, the approach to treating such histories of operations that is taken
throughout IUTch involves the frequent use of re-initialization operations (i.e., “||”)
図略

つづく