>>677
>ミレニアム問題のような重要問題の解決論文は
>「論文の刊行から2年間経過して疑義が出ないこと」
>を基準として定めてあるだって

検索すると、下記ですね
言っておきまずが、私も査読は査読だと思っています

たかが査読、されど査読
査読は一つのステップでしかないが、しかし確実に一歩進んだってこと

そして、小山先生に意見に従えば、いまから2年くらいを目途に、IUTがどう評価されるかを見ていく
そういう態度がよろしいと思います

軽々に、ダメだの、成立しているだのは早計というものです
が、私はショルツェ氏のイチャモンだけは、NGで既に査読時点で判断済みと考えています

http://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/rules-millennium-prizes
claymath
Rules for the Millennium Prizes
The revised rules for the Millennium Prize Problems were adopted by the Board of Directors of the Clay Mathematics Institute on 26 September, 2018.
Please read this document carefully before contacting CMI about a proposed solution. In particular, please note that:

1.CMI does not accept direct submission of proposed solutions.
2.The document is a complete statement of the rules and procedures: CMI will not offer any futher guidance or advice.
3.Before CMI will consider a proposed solution, all three of the following conditions must be satisfied: (i) the proposed solution must be published in a Qualifying Outlet (see §6), and (ii) at least two years must have passed since publication, and (iii) the proposed solution must have received general acceptance in the global mathematics community
27 September, 2018

Related Documents:
http://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf
Millennium Prize Description and Rules

6. Publication of a Proposed Solution to a Problem
(引用終り)
以上