>>200
>どこにどう書いてあるのかここで書いたら

ほいよ
無駄な議論を避けるために、
望月報告書から下記抜粋を貼るよ
「SS」が、Scholze側
「label」が、重要キーワードみたいですね
なお、「monodromy」についてはは、P28にある

https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUTch-discussions-2018-03.html
・2018年3月、数理研で行なわれたIUTeichに関する議論を纏めた報告書　（および関連文書）
https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Rpt2018.pdf
[Rpt2018] Report by Shinichi Mochizuki (with the cooperation of Yuichiro Hoshi)
　on the March 2018 discussions (updated on 2019-02-01

P1
§2. Scholze has, for some time, taken a somewhat negative position concerningIUTch, and his position, and indeed the position of SS, remained negative evenafter the March discussions.
My own conclusion, and indeed the conclusion of HM,after engaging in the March discussions, is as follows:The negative position of SS is a consequence of certain fundamentalmisunderstandings (to be explained in more detail in the remainder of
he present report − cf. §17 for a brief summary) on the part of SSconcerning IUTch, and, in particular, does not imply the existence ofany flaws whatsoever in IUTch.The essential gist of these misunderstandings − many of which center arounderroneous attempts to “simplify” IUTeich − may be summarized very roughlyas follows:
(Smm) Suppose that A and B are positive real numbers, which are defined so asto satisfy the relation
?2B = ?A
(which corresponds to the Θ-link).
One then proves a theorem?2B ≦ ?2A + 1(which corresponds to the multiradial representation of [IUTchIII],Theorem 3.11).
This theorem, together with the above defining relation,implies a bound on A
?A ≦ ?2A + 1, i.e., A ≦ 1
(which corresponds to [IUTchIII], Corollary 3.12).

つづく