>>205
つづき

From the point of viewof this (very rough!) summary of IUTch, the misunderstandings of SSamount to the assertion that
the theory remains essentially unaffected even if one takes A = B,
which implies (in light of the above defining relation) that A = B = 0,
in contradiction to the initial assumption that A and B are positive realnumbers. In fact, however, the essential content (i.e., main results) ofIUTch fail(s) to hold under the assumption “A = B”; moreover, the“contradiction” A = B = 0 is nothing more than a superficial consequenceof the extraneous assumption “A = B” and, in particular, does not implythe existence of any flaws whatsoever in IUTch.
(We refer to (SSIdEx),(ModEll), (HstMod) below for a “slightly less rough” explanation of theessential logical structure of an issue that is closely related to the extrane-ous assumption “A = B” in terms of・ complex structures on real vector spacesor, alternatively (and essentially equivalently), in terms of the well-knownclassical theory of・ moduli of complex elliptic curves.

P5
(T4) opposition by SS to the use of poly-morphisms in IUTch
(T4-1) as a matter of taste,
(T4-2) on the grounds that the introduction of indeterminacies such as
　　(Ind1, 2) seemed to SS to be logically unnecessary or “mean-ingless”;
(T5) opposition by SS to the use of labels in IUTch to distinguish distinctcopies of various familiar objects
　(T5-1) as a matter of taste,
　(T5-2) on the grounds that the use of such labels seemed to SS to belogically unnecessary or “meaningless”;

つづく