>>207
つづき

P9
Indeed, it appears that SS did not dispute the logical feasibility or consistency ofthe approach of (H2) in the context of IUTch. Rather, their main objection tothe approach of (H2) in the context of IUTch appears to be to the effect thatthey believed this approach of (H2) in the context of IUTch, i.e., in particular,in the context of (HEx1), (HEx2-1), (HEx2-2), to be unnecessary/superfluous. Inparticular, it appears that one of the fundamental assertions of SS is to the effectthat(SSInd) the essential content (e.g., multiradial algorithms) of IUTch is entirelyunaffected even if the indeterminacies (Ind1,2) (cf. the discussion of§6) are eliminated.

P15
§10. During the afternoon session of the final day of the March discussions, SS madethe following assertion, which may be thought of as a sort of concrete realization oftheir assertion (SSInd):(SSId) The multiradial algorithms of IUTch may be applied to relate the Θ-,q-hol. strs. that appear in the following “id-version” (cf. (T3)) of theΘ-link

P28
§14. Another topic to which a substantial amount of time and energy was devoted,especially during the first few days of the March discussions, was the topic of labelsin IUTch (cf. (T5)) to distinguish distinct copies of various familiar objects thatplay substantively different roles in the various apparatuses treated in IUTch.SS (especially, Scholze) were substantially opposed to the use of labels in IUTch.This opposition appeared to be based, to a substantial extent, on “taste/aesthetics”(cf. (T5-1)). In this context, however, it should be remembered that in fact “labels”− i.e., in effect

つづく