>>45
>当然中島啓PRIMS編集委員の見解も PRIMS特別編集委員会と同じく
>「4編の望月新一著IUT論文は全く新しい理論のIUT理論による完全な論文で
>論文よりabc予想が証明された。」

・肯定的な意味で、それは正しい
・Ivan Fesenko氏も 2015年時点で、（下記）”This theory is so radically different from anything that came before it that it is natural to ask whether it will induce a paradigm shift, and also how it may change the way one can approach mathematical research.”と記す
・これから、徐々に遠アーベル以外の数学者たちにも認められていきます

(参考)
略//ivanfesenko.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/notesoniut.pdf
Ivan Fesenko
[L1] Arithmetic deformation theory via arithmetic fundamental groups and nonarchimedean theta functions, notes on the work of Shinichi Mochizuki, Europ. J. Math. (2015) 1:405–440

3.3. The work of Shinichi Mochizuki.
This theory is so radically different from anything that came before it that it is natural to ask whether it will induce a paradigm shift, and also how it may change the way one can approach mathematical research.
There construction algorithm-theoretic approach of [31]-I-III,as well as of [30]-III, [28], contains elements that are radically different from the usual approach to proving theorems, and hence from the usual approach to writing mathematical papers.
To some degree, IUT may be thought of asasort of meta-structure which acts on appropriate parts of conventional scheme-theoretic arithmetic geometry.
In doing so, it allows one to explicate, with relative ease, phenomena(such as the Vojta conjecture) that seemed inaccessible via existing mathematical theories.