>>793
>馬鹿がずっとScholze＝Z氏と言い続けてるが、本当にそうならなんで「ダチョウ作戦」を続けてるはずのZ氏がJoshi論文の論争にしゃしゃり出てくるんだ？答えてみろ

・それは、記憶では、下記Joshi論文で使われている ”Anabelomorphy”が、Scholze氏の"perfectoid spaces as developed by [Sch12b] "と関係していて
　望月IUTとも関連していて・・。そして、2020年か それ以前からScholze氏とメールのやり取りがあったらしい（望月氏とも）
・で、Scholze氏は、Joshi氏に「間違っているから、早く軌道修正した方が良い」と言ってやったんだね。彼は親切だね
・これで「ダチョウ作戦」を止めたのかどうかは知らない。Stixはとっくにやめたみたいだが

(参考)
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/467696/global-character-of-abc-szpiro-inequalities
Global character of ABC/Szpiro inequalities
asked Mar 25 at 12:17
Jon23
Answers
This observation is relevant to the discussion of Joshi's manuscript. Indeed, the key result is Theorem 6.10.1 in Joshi's paper, giving upper and lower bounds on a certain volume. Both inequalities are proved by summing up local inequalities, i.e. inequalities at each prime p
. For the first one, see the proof of Theorem 9.11.1 of Joshi's previous paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13508
answered Mar 29 at 18:59
Peter Scholze

https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?advanced=&terms-0-operator=AND&terms-0-term=kirti+joshi&terms-0-field=author&classification-mathematics=y&classification-physics_archives=all&classification-include_cross_list=include&date-filter_by=all_dates&date-year=&date-from_date=&date-to_date=&date-date_type=submitted_date&abstracts=hide&size=50&order=-announced_date_first
Webpage of Kirti Joshi Preprints

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.01890.pdf
On Mochizuki’s idea of Anabelomorphy and its applications
Kirti Joshi
April 24, 2020

P10
1.5 Two well-known theorems are examples of anabelomorphy
The first theorem (discussed in Section 25) is the famous theorem of Fontaine-Colmez (see [CF00]) (Fontaine’s Conjecture: “weakly admissible =⇒ admissible”).
My remark is that the proof of this theorem is an example of Anabelomorphy carried out on the p-adic Hodge side (i.e. on the filtered (φ, N)-modules).
The second theorem (discussed in Section 24) is due to Scholze (see [Sch12a]).
My observation is that the theory of perfectoid spaces provides yet another example of anabelomorphy and in particular one should view the proof, in loc. cit., of the “weight monodromy conjecture” as an example of anabelomorphy.
Notably that this proof replaces a hypersurface (for which one wants to prove weight monodromy theorem) by an anabelomorphic hypersurface for which the sought result is already established by other means.

つづく