>>421
ふっふ、ほっほ
自分が何を論じているか分っているか？

　>>4より (引用開始)
Probabilities in a riddle involving axiom of choice
asked Dec 9 '13 at 16:16 Denis
（Denis質問）
I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N-1}, but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up.
（Pruss氏）
The probabilistic reasoning depends on a conglomerability assumption, ・・・and we have no reason to think that the conglomerability assumption is appropriate.
(引用終り)

・このDec 9 '13 (2013年)の議論では
　Denis氏質問
　”I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N-1}, but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up.”
　に対して
　Pruss氏は 反論しているでしょ？
　繰り返すが
　”The probabilistic reasoning depends on a conglomerability assumption, ・・・and we have no reason to think that the conglomerability assumption is appropriate.”
　要するに、Denis氏主張の論は、”the conglomerability assumption is appropriate.”ではないから
　ダメだということでしょ？ ｗ ；ｐ）