>>770
(引用開始)
確率論の範囲外www
勝手に範囲決めてんのかよ
数学の論理で扱えないなら、それを論証してみろよ。
(引用終り)

その 確率論の範囲外の一つの論が Pruss氏>>4より
Probabilities in a riddle involving axiom of choice
asked Dec 9 '13 at 16:16 Denis
（Denis質問）
I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N?1}, but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up.
（Pruss氏）
The probabilistic reasoning depends on a conglomerability assumption, ・・・and we have no reason to think that the conglomerability assumption is appropriate.
ということ

つまり、決定番号dの集合が、無限集合になると
そのままでは、”The probabilistic reasoning depends on a conglomerability assumption, ・・・and we have no reason to think that the conglomerability assumption is appropriate.”

なお>>753もご参照