さて
これ いいね ；ｐ）
https://ivanfesenko.org/
Ivan Fesenko
https://ivanfesenko.org/?page_id=80
News – Ivan Fesenko
・About the study of IUT
https://ivanfesenko.org/wp-content/uploads/rapg-1.pdf
ABOUT THE STUDY OF IUT
IVAN FESENKO
ABSTRACT. This document presents various aspects of the study of the IUT theory of S. Mochizuki in the
period of 2012–2025. The presentation is based on first-hand knowledge and peer reviewed published papers.
Ｐ4
A Case: since 2015, Scholze, who did not have at that time and does not have now any research track
record in anabelian geometry, chose to repeatedly make public claims about some “problems” with IUT,
never providing any concrete math evidence, despite mine and other mathematicians requests. He and Stix
produced a short report in March 2018 about their take on IUT. They failed to clearly acknowledge that their
report is not about IUT but about their own oversimplified version of IUT. Their version is fundamentally
different from IUT. Their travesty of IUT easily leads to a contradiction, but this has nothing to do with
the original IUT theory. The report included no proofs but sentences such as “it seems to us”. Their
mistakes were explained in this report, this document, this relatively elementary large paper and this down
to earth large paper. After Scholze had got his award in 2018, very non-ethically he abruptly stopped all
the communication with the IUT experts. This fact leads to a natural question whether the main reason for
his aggressive ignorant behaviour towards IUT was motivated by getting math awards rather than truth. The
editors of the special volume of PRIMS containing the IUT papers were fully aware of this situation when
making their decision about the publication of the papers. In August 2023 the author of IUT made public
this short report which includes further details. Stix was listed among online participants of the 2025 IUT
workshop. Scholze’s position on IUT was taken non-critically by some mathematicians, including young
ones.

つづく