>>168
>あなたがscholzeさんの書いたことを理解して居ないからですよ

ふっふ、ほっほ
下記のKirti JoshiのSCHOLZE文書の批判より
１）P4 Table1 Comparison of claims of Mochizuki,Scholze-Stix and Joshi
　において 少なくとも ５点の 望月IUT論文の改ざんを Kirti Joshiは 指摘しています
２）P5 Table2 で [Scholze and Stix,2018],[Scholze,2021] を厳しく批判しています

どちらが正しいか？
私には 分りませんが
[Scholze and Stix,2018],[Scholze,2021] を礼賛する人だけでは 無いってことです■

(参考)>>11より再録
Kirti Joshi で、SCHOLZE文書批判を読むべし
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.10568
[Submitted on 29 Apr 2025]
Final Report on the Mochizuki-Scholze-Stix Controversy
Kirti Joshi
This report provides my mathematical findings regarding the Mochizuki-Scholze-Stix controversy surrounding Mochizuki's Inter-Universal Teichmüller Theory.
P3
§ 1.3 Tabulation of Findings The following tables (Tables 1 and 2) provide a comparison of hypotheses of Mochizuki and Joshi and the omissions of these hypothesis by Scholze-Stix leading to incorrect mathematical conclusions.

P4
Table1 Comparison of claims of Mochizuki,Scholze-Stix and Joshi

(object Mochizuki vs Scholze-Stix)
・geom. base point　　ignored
・Valuationdata　　　nomention of distinct valuation data
・log-Links　　　　　ignored
・Theta-Links　　　　argue that such objects cannot exist
・distinct Arith. 　　declare that these cannot exist
　Holomorphic Structures

P5
Table2 Status of various assertions of [Scholze and Stix,2018],[Scholze,2021]

Sect. 2.1.2(and also[Scholze, 2021]) asserts that distinct
(1) Hodge Theaters
(2) Etale Pictures
(3) Frobenius Pictures
do not exist

vs

(1) distinct Hodge-Theaters exist [Joshi, 2024a,Theorem10.11.5.1];
(2) distinct´etale Pictures exist[Joshi,2024a, Proposition8.3.1.1];
(3) distinct Frobenius Pictures exist [Joshi, 2024a,Proposition8.3.1.2]

ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー

Section2.2(maindisproofargument)

vs

This argument of [Scholze and Stix,2018] fails because the Θgau-Link does come with a nontrivial j2-scaling factor for j=1,..., (ℓ−1)/2 and also is equipped with a non-trivial Galois action [Joshi,2024a,Theorem 4.2.2.1 and §4.2.3 and §8.10]